graydawntreader
Forums Enthusiast
Correct. Neither does modern medicine always mean safer. That is why one needs to read up on either side.no no no, natural does not always mean safer! especially when using things with natural oils in them.
when i get back to work i will look in my aroma therapy book.... there are loads of oils and things that are all natural that can even kill a dog. Cause miscarriage, sever skin reactions, etc.
What I meant when I said that the articles on natural being bad made little sense to me, I meant things like the raw diet. And a slightly variation in the definition of "natural". You can mean natural as in not processed, from the wild, or you can mean natural as in something an animal (such as a dog) would do or eat in the wild. I meant the latter when I made the statement on articles against natural. Mainly, I was thinking of all of the articles against a raw diet. They make no sense to me because dogs are carnivores (IMO), and because the raw diet has been great for my dogs. I was also thinking of holistic treatments recommended by holistic vets.
Last edited:





