so viewing links to pix online is copyright infringement?
she's not talking about just printing someone else's pix- she wanted to know which one she should BUY................... to hang in her home....
I understand that she
isn't trying to do anything wrong or shortchange the owner of the photos. For that reason, I hesitated to comment at all. It just seemed that the conversation was starting to go too far from the actual legality of copyright infringement. The short answer is that
WHY you use someone's copyrighted image or
WHAT you are trying to do with it doesn't matter, it's use is
probably going to be illegal (with, as I said a very few exceptions) absent permission from the owner. Quite frankly, what we have going in our favor here (in a way) is that there are likely no damages (
legal damages) incurred with images posted here. As a result, it wouldn't be worth anything to go after one of us. The bigger portion of a copyright infringement case is the element of damages.
It is no surprise that the SN TOS
specifically tells us
not to post copyrighted material
w/o specific permission of the copyright owner.
Someone is well aware of the
potential problems (even though the problems are unlikely to occur here). To Tabith's credit, she
clearly indicated that she was linking to a collage of images, but I don't remember anything on the linked page that
specifically indicated that the images were owned by
whomever. As such,
my interpretation is that the rules of copyright protections were still breached.