When Did Balance Become A Dirty Word

But what clicker training doesn't do is set limits. I had a dog in open that was 100% clicker trained. Seemed like a good idea at the time. She was also extremely sound sensitive. So she would break stays at the smallest sharp noise. But she would also break stays just because she felt like it. There were never any consequences, and it was a fun game, so why not? Mom will just come and get me and put me back. Made me crazy. So never again will I train a stay with 100% positive methods.
 
When dod balance become a dirty word

So never again will I train a stay with 100% positive methods.[/QUOTE]

So what do you do then to train it?Choke collar yanking on the neck?
 
I have to say I'm a little confused by all the acrimony here, and the debate of "positive" vs "nonpositive." is it possible folks are using the same words to mean different things? I can only speak for myself, and I am not training my dogs for agility or any kind of competition--they are retired conformation champions, and the only training I am interested in is that they be well-behaved and listen to me when I am trying to keep them safe, so my situation is less intense than many of yours. They do wear "choke" collars while out walking--that's for safety, not punishment. And they don't pull at all, so the collars don't tighten against their necks. I will yell a loud NO or a harsh sound to get their attention and make them stop an undesirable behavior; I would never in a million years hit them. I will say "bad dog!" and go over and physically carry one away from somewhere they shouldn't be (like eating bird seed) if all else fails. I will then reprimand the dog and put him or her inside; two minutes later, all is forgiven, on both sides. Is that "positive"? Or not?
 
But what clicker training doesn't do is set limits. I had a dog in open that was 100% clicker trained. Seemed like a good idea at the time. She was also extremely sound sensitive. So she would break stays at the smallest sharp noise. But she would also break stays just because she felt like it. There were never any consequences, and it was a fun game, so why not? Mom will just come and get me and put me back. Made me crazy. So never again will I train a stay with 100% positive methods.

That is huge problem that killing positive dog trainers. Positive does not mean permissive, those two terms are not interchangable. Dog has to know from the beginning what rules are what is releasing them from stay and what is not. And ¨what is not¨part I teach by letting dog to have choices and control the consequences.
 
But what clicker training doesn't do is set limits. I had a dog in open that was 100% clicker trained. Seemed like a good idea at the time. She was also extremely sound sensitive. So she would break stays at the smallest sharp noise. But she would also break stays just because she felt like it. There were never any consequences, and it was a fun game, so why not? Mom will just come and get me and put me back. Made me crazy. So never again will I train a stay with 100% positive methods.

It is honestly very easy to get an extremely reliable sit/down stay with clicker training and positive reinforcement, so I'm wondering if your negative experiences are due to the knowledge/ability of the trainer you're training with, as opposed to the methods. Even within clicker training there is a wide variety of methods - some better than others. I would probably get frustrated too if I didn't have success with a specific method. Come on over to Canada - I'll show you a whole other side of training, and then we can discuss training methods over a few drinks since we're both pretty passionate about it :smile2:

I have to say I'm a little confused by all the acrimony here, and the debate of "positive" vs "nonpositive." is it possible folks are using the same words to mean different things? I can only speak for myself, and I am not training my dogs for agility or any kind of competition--they are retired conformation champions, and the only training I am interested in is that they be well-behaved and listen to me when I am trying to keep them safe, so my situation is less intense than many of yours. They do wear "choke" collars while out walking--that's for safety, not punishment. And they don't pull at all, so the collars don't tighten against their necks. I will yell a loud NO or a harsh sound to get their attention and make them stop an undesirable behavior; I would never in a million years hit them. I will say "bad dog!" and go over and physically carry one away from somewhere they shouldn't be (like eating bird seed) if all else fails. I will then reprimand the dog and put him or her inside; two minutes later, all is forgiven, on both sides. Is that "positive"? Or not?

People who love animals tend to be fairly passionate about what they believe is best for those animals - and there's nothing wrong with that. This is one of the better threads on this forum because it is making people discuss, question, consider, and justify their point of view. Opinions are easy - everyone has an opinion - but a thread like this forces you to consider whether you are able to justify the opinion you have. If you can't justify it, it may be time to consider changing your opinion. I can't count the number of times a thread on here has made me reconsider an opinion I considered a fact.

When it comes to defining words like "balanced" and "positive", there will be a range on the spectrum. A lot of people on here do compete, and so some of us differentiate how we train for behaviour vs. how we train for dog sports. That's why a lot of us clarify by giving examples of behaviours we're training.

There's nothing wrong with a loose choke chain - it doesn't make you a "negative" trainer. The type of trainer you are has less to do with the equipment you use than it does with your temperament and the way you interact with your dog. As I mentioned in a previous post, when training for dogsports I am positive only, when it comes to behaviour I am a balanced trainer (with a large skew to the positive side). When I'm training dogs for behaviour, I always keep the concept of a "goodwill bank" in my head. Like any bank account, you don't want to have an overdraft on your goodwill account.

I increase the goodwill I have with my dogs by playing, conditioning, training, snuggling, and interacting with them. I withdraw from my goodwill bank when I raise my voice, get frustrated, or use intimidating body language. The funny thing is, the more goodwill I put in, the less I have to take out because of the relationship. The majority of the time, if one of my dogs is misbehaving, all I have to do is a soft, low toned "ah ah ah", and the dog stops. So if you are continuously forming a bond with your dogs and working at having a positive relationship, when you do have to make a withdrawal from the goodwill bank account at least there will be plenty left in there to ensure the relationship continues to thrive. As long as you are depositing more goodwill than you are withdrawing, I would consider you a balanced but fair owner.
 
It has nothing to do with my preference.

Joe Q Public reading this forum will quickly come to the conclusion that people think choke chains are evil things wielded by uneducated, evil people. Then Joe Q Public reads your post about maybe martingales are only a "kinder" choke, with "kinder" in quotes, implying that you really don't think they are kinder.

So Joe Q Public goes out and buys a buckle collar for his/her Sheltie (because chokes and martingales are evil, remember? he read it here!) which his dog quickly slips and off it goes.

What I don't want to see happen is for perfectly good, useful collars to get lumped in with something that some people strongly oppose (for whatever reason). I'd rather see a dog on a choke being walked than slipping an ill-fitting buckle and getting hit by a car.

Ok I can understand your point now. A martingale is NOT a kinder choke collar. It is not a choke collar at all. It is however useful for dogs that slip out of regular collars. Shelties with their wide necks and big ruffs and comparatively small heads do it regularly.

I think something to be aware of is that some manufacuters actually call them training collars. They are not! I think that was what clantyresheltie was referring to.

This discussion is a good one. I hope everyone can keep their tempers and let it be an honest and insightful sharing of techniques.

I've always believed there is no one way. What works for one dog may not work for another. So keeping your mind open, for sure.

I hope this thread can continue without acrimony setting in. I look forward to more ideas.
 
It is honestly very easy to get an extremely reliable sit/down stay with clicker training and positive reinforcement, so I'm wondering if your negative experiences are due to the knowledge/ability of the trainer you're training with, as opposed to the methods. Even within clicker training there is a wide variety of methods - some better than others. I would probably get frustrated too if I didn't have success with a specific method. Come on over to Canada - I'll show you a whole other side of training, and then we can discuss training methods over a few drinks since we're both pretty passionate about it :smile2:

Trainer? No, I was in a yank and pull training school as that "kid" that didn't know better. I went with what worked according to the books I read. I was in classes with instructors that didn't think one could teach a drop on recall until the dog had it's novice title, because obviously the dog would get confused. They worked my drops over and over mixed with regular recalls to try to screw my dog up (protip: you totally can teach them together).

My dogs are still mostly positively trained, with some exceptions, mostly based on what didn't work in the past. Just like I discovered the "choose to heel" method is useless with my current dog, I discovered the "never say no" method to not work with my sound sensitive dog. FWIW, my sound sensitive dog NEVER failed an individual exercise. Ever. She never failed to drop, she never went around a jump (the jump was way more fun), she loved go outs, she loved to heel. It was those stays. Once she was diagnosed with kidney failure (at 4.5 years old) her obedience career was over.
 
Great thread! Glad I was searching "pacing" and found this!

Is it any wonder obedience entries are declining when the very definition of obedience (and how to get it) are so controversial, from all sides?!

Actually, the latest AKC statistics show that obedience entries are UP! I'll have to go dig for the percentage ... I think the future of obedience dog sport is going to be secure. (hope so!)

Owning a dog in today's society is becoming increasingly difficult. Neighbor disputes, dog bites, more public places prohibiting dogs ... and of course, everyone is an expert ... :biggrin2:

What is that quote from Boone, I think... "if you want an opinon ask a human, if you want the facts, ask the dog?"
 
Back
Top