............... The dishwasher is always interesting (he always thought it was his job to pre-rinse the plates).................

?????It's not our job to pre-rinse the plates????

MMM.
P.S. Sorry Ms Barb that your thumb is still sore.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
............... The dishwasher is always interesting (he always thought it was his job to pre-rinse the plates).................

?????It's not our job to pre-rinse the plates????

I am sorry to hear that. if a dog bites you, it is my opinion that he/she doesn't respect you as an alpha. A subordinate NEVER bites the alpha. This is grounds for a serious fight. That being said, it is time to re-establish your dominance.
I have four shelties, they see me as an alpha to the point that they never run off, I don't need to leash them, they always look for my command, and they're genuinely fantastic dogs, and very happy as a result.
People tend to equate not dominant with unhappiness in canines, but humanizing dogs is typically what causes this dominant type of behavior to begin with, and is counterproductive.
A dog is truly happy when it knows it's place in your pack, which is below any and all humans.
Some disagree with hitting your dog. I disagree with physical abuse. Smacking your dog on the bottom after it initially bites you is not abuse, it is correcting a bad behavior. Your dog needs to understand who is boss. Dominate the dog, make sure they spend time on their back, (after calming down and becoming submissive) with you over them. Any bites should be counteracted with AT LEAST a strong touch. Don't HURT the animal, but assert your position. A dog needs to "fear" it's alpha... but our definition of fear is different, to a dog, it's basically a respect for the alpha. If the dog acts out of line, it needs to know there are consequences.
Two of my dogs don't need to be touched when they are bad, a yell or noise scares them enough, and they discontinue the behavior. Dogs who continue the negative behavior and seem unaffected by words, need to be reminded that you are serious.
In a pack, if the alpha is challenged, it could ultimately lead to the subordinate dog's death. Obviously, nobody is telling you to kill your dog, just helping shed some light on the idea that smacking your dog is bad.
Look at children these days, you can't spank them at all. Look how we've all turned out. We are all entitled to everything, we don't listen, we disregard authority, we don't apply ourselves, we don't respect our elders, let alone our parents, and school grades are worse than ever.
Ideally, a minimal smack on the bottom of a bad dog will get the point across and really only have to happen once. What do I know, I have four well-behaved dogs, worked at a vet for a few years, and offer puppy training to local people in the area.
Again, we need to accept that dogs are dogs, not people, not kids, not toys, not inanimate objects, and not anything other than a canine.
Sorry for the 10 page essay, I hope it helped. I am new on these forums, so I figured I would jump right in to a discussion I felt I could offer a valuable two cents on.
Hey there
welcome to the Forums!
I resectfully but completely disagree with pretty much everything of the above. See the against dominance threads etc, which most of the Forum now know where I stand. lol
My opinion is that you are quoting non scientific and outdated methods, not supported anymore by most respectable dog trainers, as all of the above is NOT based on the theory of learning.
Dogs are NOT there to dominate their owners in general, and have changed through their partnership with Humans over thousands of years of domestication.
Even new evidence changes the way the domincance theory is being viewed and needs to be demystefied, even when it does come to wolves.

Thank you for the welcome, and you absolutely have the right to disagree.
I can however tell you that my "outdated methods" work best with animals who do not respond to positive reinforcement solely. Classifying all dogs as responsive to only positive reinforcement is just as ignorant (in my opinion) as assuming all people of a race, religion, or any other possible stereotypical attribute are the same.
I also have many friends who view dogs the way you do, and I would say that I have by far the best-behaved, happy dogs on the planet. I do respect your opinion.
When i worked at the vet, I was always given the aggressive dogs, fear biter or aggressive biter, it was my responsibility.
I know what works from thousands of different dogs and my experiences. If what you do truly works for you, and can justify your beliefs to yourself, that is ALL that matters. I commend you on your abilities in that sense. I know what shocks and awes EVERYONE who comes in contact with me walking four dogs, or with four dogs in my home, is how well-mannered and fantastic my pack is.
Thanks again for the welcome!![]()
Well, to weigh in on the middle ground....when Bacca bit me, I'm pretty sure I gave him a good whack to release me. When you are dealing with an aggressive behaviour, I don't think its the time to play nice and say "please sit"
But then I followed up with some more positive training with the bones. Offering and taking away, at my whim and under my control.
And after only 1 week, I feel like I've got these boys back under control again.
All to say that there is a time and place for everything.
lol, ok, let's continue this somewhere else as I am ready to discuss anytime
Not want to highjack Barb's thread... hehehe
You mentioned working with these animals at the Vets, I dare say much of what you describe of course fixes the problem temporarily as the dog is scared, but that behaviour WILL be only surpressed. However it causes distrust and will not be fostering a working relationship as it will cause the dog to shut down and distrust people.