It's virtually impossible to be impartial about pit bulls; the statistics speak for themselves in the United States. Just this year alone, 11 out of 16 dogs involved in fatalities were pit bulls or pit bull mixes. (See
www.dogsbite.org) Of the remaining 5, they consisted of a German Shepherd, a Husky, a Rottie, a Golden Retriever mix, and a mastiff/Rhodesian ridgeback.
Note that all these dogs were involved in FATALITIES. In other words, they killed HUMAN BEINGS. The pit bulls were the only ones of the group who attacked in pairs. The rest were single person/single dog encounters. The breakdown of victims is telling:
- an 84 year old grandmother, dog owned by her grandson (pit bull)
- a 16 month old child, dog owned by his grandparents (pit bull)
- a 6 year old child, dog owned by a family friend (german shephers - expecially disturbing as the dog was supposedly trained as a medical service dog belonging to a man with PTSD)
- a 2 day old newborn, dog owned by parents (Husky)
- a 59 year old female letter carrier, dog owned by the owner of the property she was delivering to (pit bull)
- a 17 month old child, dog owned by a neighbor (Rottie)
- a 4 year old child, dog owned by a neighbor (pit bull)
- a 92 year old great-grandfather, dogs (2) owned by a neighbor (pit bulls)
- a 2 month old baby, dog owned by his parents (golden retriever mix)
- a 74 year old grandfather, dog owned by the victim himself (pit bull)
- a 15 month old girl, dog owned by her father (pit bull)
- a 73 year old woman, dogs (2) owned by a neighbor (pit bulls)
- a 3 day old newborn, dog owned by her parents (pit bull mix)
These dogs are prone to attack the weak, the old, the young. Yet in most of these cases, the dogs were not put down, and there were no charges filed against the owners of the dogs. With a few exceptions, most of the dogs were family pets - most of the victims (excepting the infants) more than likely very familiar with the dogs as they belonged to family members.
I do have a friend with two very polite, nicely behaved pit bulls. They are very nicely trained and she is a responsible owner. But would she (or I for that matter) leave the dogs unattended while family members or visitors are in her home? No, she would not. Neither would I. They are just unsafe breeds. The statistics speak for themselves. This is only half the year. How many other deaths will be caused by careless, ignorant owners of these monsters?
I love dogs, but I would never have a dangerous dog in my home. My dogs are trained, given tons of "civilizing" activities, and I think they'd rather die than bite anybody. But I still watch them like a hawk around young children and strangers, as I don't know their early lives and experiences and haven't had them long enough to be able to "read" them as well as I'd like.
You should have to pass a test before owning a breed that kills. You must pass practical and written tests to drive a car - which can become a dangerous weapon. Isn't owning one of these dogs require just as high a level of owner/driver training?